Followup to RESTful thinking considered harmful

rubyflow.com 31 Mar '12, 11pm

Followup to RESTful thinking considered harmful

Followup to RESTful thinking considered harmful Posted by wvanbergen on March 31, 2012 — 0 comments Because many people didn't get the point I was trying to make in my RESTful considered harmful post (due to my own fault), I wrote a followup post for clarification. Comments Post a Comment Comment abilities for non registered users are currently deactivated, pending time to add a proper CAPTCHA to solve the escalating spam problem. Sorry!

Full article: http://www.rubyflow.com/items/7444-followup-to-restful-th...

Tweets

@domix » 01 Apr '12, 1am
RT @chillicoder: Followup to RESTful thinking considered harmful [link]
@fraispy » 01 Apr '12, 12am
RT @ Rubyflow Followup to RESTful thinking considered harmful: Because many people didn't get the point I was tr... [link]
@pacorro2000 » 31 Mar '12, 11pm
Followup to RESTful thinking considered harmful: Because many people didn't get the point I was trying to make i... [link]
@JHurrahGReader » 01 Apr '12, 12am
Followup to RESTful thinking considered harmful [link]
@chillicoder » 01 Apr '12, 12am
Followup to RESTful thinking considered harmful [link]
@rubyflow » 01 Apr '12, 12am
Followup to RESTful thinking considered harmful [link]
@railsless » 01 Apr '12, 12am
Followup to RESTful thinking considered harmful: Because many people didn't get the point I was trying to make i... [link]